What is Victor Niederhoffer’s historical validation for naïve reasons?
When do fundamentalists and market technicians in consensus?
Are there things even consensus can’t solve?
How does divergence look explainable on a hidsignt basis?
What is the real challenge when it comes to market divergence?
Why do Elliotticians despite such sharpness in pattern recognition lack the command on intermarket picture?
“Elliotticians tag, ‘we are here’ by drawing a fractalled contour of a wave structure. They count it, label it and point ‘we are going here’ in 2012. Even Elliotticians despite such sharpness lack the command on intermarket picture. We decided to understand intermarket failure. We took 55 assets from the following asset classes; metals, energy, agro, bonds, currency, equity, and benchmarked all of them against ….”
Why does Murphy call the study intermarket analysis not intermarket cycles?
Are markets not supposed to do what they are doing?
Can intermarket failure be explained?
The latest time triads explains intermarket failures. You can download the report from the following links.
Read the complete article on Alrroya
For more information on Time Triads mail us at support@orpheus.asia
Time Triads, Time Fractals, Time Arbitrage, Performance Cycles are terms coined by Orpheus Research. Time Triads is our weekly market letter. The report covers various aspects on TIME patterns, TIME forecast, alternative research, emerging markets, behavioral finance, market fractals, econohistory, econostatistics, time cyclicality, investment psychology, socioeconomics, pop cultural trends, macro economics, interest rates, derivatives, money management, Intermarket trends etc.



Smith, Pareto and the divergence debate
Life is all about making sense of information. This information could be personal, economic, or societal kind. When we comprehend information, we make a decision, which we assume to be positive. So at a certain level we are trying to understand performance and how to perform as individuals and make performant choices? Performance assumes a kind of order. We try to create order in minds from disorder in the external world. This disorder could also be called divergence.
Divergence is a phenomenon seen in nature and markets. It is something that needs explaining and can be ineffable at times. It is linked with change or rate of change, fast and faster change. How fast can a price asset grow or decay? Divergence is also assumed to have a non normal aspect. It happens less than normal. Normality assumes that markets and 90% of its components move higher together or vice versa. Divergence is different from normality and could indicate change, a potential reversal. Divergence is also known as non confirmation in technical analysis. Divergence also creates news, as something that is non normal is strange and worth talking about. Divergence can be seen in information, data, and patterns. Divergence is studied and researched. It is a system that can be built as a strategy.
Adam smith (1723-1790) talked about the invisible hand, what we don’t know, something unpredictable, a kind of divergence. Vilfredo Pareto (1848-1923) talked about non homogeneous wealth allocation. 80% of the wealth is with 20% of people. This unequal allocation was a divergence.
Read the complete article at Alrroya…
To read more, download the latest report of Time Triads from the links below.
For more information on Time Triads mail us at support@orpheus.asia
Time Triads, Time Fractals, Time Arbitrage, Performance Cycles are terms coined by Orpheus Research. Time Triads is our weekly market letter. The report covers various aspects on TIME patterns, TIME forecast, alternative research, emerging markets, behavioral finance, market fractals, econohistory, econostatistics, time cyclicality, investment psychology, socioeconomics, pop cultural trends, macro economics, interest rates, derivatives, money management, Intermarket trends etc.
Orpheus e-store
Orpheus Research at Reuters – United Kingdom
Orpheus Research at Reuters – United States